2 ms·
the actual question is wrong. to illustrate the framing effect, which underlies prospect theory, the question should be: 1. choose a) 90% for $1000 or b) 100%
by andylei 15y ago
the actual question is wrong. to illustrate the framing effect, which underlies prospect theory, the question should be:
1. choose a) 90% for $1000 or b) 100% for $900
a. you just got $1000. choose a) 10% chance to loose $1000 or b) 100% chance to loose $100.
according to rational actor theory, people should choose the same thing both times. however, people often don't. its the framing effect. decisions are different when framed as losses or games.
this builds the foundation for prospect theory. rational actor theory says that your preferences are consistent. prospect theory says that you have a reference point and your utility function is inconsistent and changes depending on your reference point.
- joemoon 15y agoExactly. The OP's version can be described as these choices: - A 10% chance of losing (you don't get any money). - A 10% chance of winning (you don't lose any money). These two are options are in no way equivalent. In your version, you have: - 10% chance of losing (you don't get $1,000). - 10% chance of losing (you have to pay $1,000). These situations are comparable and can be used to test the framing effect.