3 ms·
Or, the threat was overstated because the product was protected. Don’t hold your breath for a trend reversal in SF.
by Our_Benefactors 4y ago
Or, the threat was overstated because the product was protected. Don’t hold your breath for a trend reversal in SF.
- ViViDboarder 4y agoUntil the plastic results in loss of sales because people don’t want to bother, we probably won’t see it reversed. The cost is sunk. Why wouldn’t they leave it, even if ineffective, as long as it doesn’t cost them anything?
- stryker7001 4y agoStores have thought of this, and know the effects already. Apparently putting products behind glass causes almost a 50% drop in sales( because people don’t want to bother), so stores would prefer not to put anything behind glass or a counter, but they do because the alternative is 100% loss from theft.