> To be clear, my comment wasn't a critique... GP is responding to other naysayers without directly replying to them (: And to be clear, I think going down th

> To be clear, my comment wasn't a critique... GP is responding to other naysayers without directly replying to them (: And to be clear, I think going down the LLM rabbit-hole is absolutely the thing for them to do (see the quip about AI being their "core biz"), but you wonder why it wasn't them that came up with ChatGPT-like system in the first place, if disrupting is what's Neeva is about? Though, I don't think Neeva is out to disrupt Google Search when the differentiator is merely a different business model; I mean, per definition of the term as Christensen meant it [0], it is pretty hard to disrupt free. [0] What is disruptive innovation (2016), https://archive.is/IzaKy https://archive.is/IzaKy (hbs.org)