4 ms·
The click-baity headline and overly confident (given the evidence) conclusion mar what could have been a good article.
by vannevar 4y ago
The click-baity headline and overly confident (given the evidence) conclusion mar what could have been a good article.
- ulrashida 4y agoIndeed. Reached the same conclusion. It's ironic that the individual decries the journal editors and authors for corrupt motives while they, as a blog poster, get to shelter behind a shroud of anonymity. My first reaction after their conclusion was wondering what associations they have that may be biasing their own work. If they are that concerned about conflict of interest they should be more transparent in their own authorship.
- agentultra 4y agoYou should see the other article they published.
- mbauman 4y agoThe blog author also takes umbrage at the paper's authors' other work and biases. Since the blog author is anonymous it's not as clear what their biases may be, but the only other blog they have posted comes to the conclusion that "whatever travails American Blacks suffered during slavery no longer matter for their socioeconomic attainment today," citing an infamous eugenicist. Take that as you will.