4 ms·

no opportunity means they were following too closely. if the car in front of you suddenly comes to a complete stop, you need to have enough time to brake to pr

no opportunity means they were following too closely. if the car in front of you suddenly comes to a complete stop, you need to have enough time to brake to prevent yourself from hitting that vehicle without changing lanes. if you are so close that you can't stop in time in that situation, you are following too closely. end of statement. yes that does happen to cars, by the way. a car driving at speed X which hits another car head-on at speed X will cause both cars to come to a complete stop, instantly, provided they are the same mass. usually they are not the same mass, so that car which you were following could suddenly not only stop, but change direction and accelerate towards you. crashes also usually don't happen head-on, so you must be ready when the inevitable does happen to you or around you. sometimes you can't prevent what happens, but you can always prevent colliding into the car in front of you. these things happen hundreds of times per day, if not thousands of times per day, EVERY DAY. If you don't make time to stop, you do not have time to stop.

mlyle 4y ago
> no opportunity means they were following too closely. The car departed the lane next to them, dove in front of them, and stopped. Do you always leave enough space so that a vehicle in the lane next to you can do this? > if you are so close that you can't stop in time in that situation, you are following too closely. end of statement. > yes that does happen to cars, by the way. a car driving at speed X which hits another car head-on at speed X will cause both cars to come to a complete stop, instantly, provided they are the same mass. usually they are not the same mass, so that car which you were following could suddenly not only stop, but change direction and accelerate towards you. Recommended following distances are nowhere near "instant stop of vehicle in front of you plus reaction time". E.g. California recommends 3 seconds of distance at your current speed-- 286 feet. Real world stopping distances are often ~300+ feet, after 100 feet+ of reaction time (yes, I know that vehicle tests in ideal conditions often achieve something more like 150 feet not including reaction times).
- naikrovek 4y ago
  please get a "rules of the road" booklet from your local driver's services facility and read it. assuming you are in California: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/laws-and-rules-of-the-road/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-han... operating a motor vehicle in the United States requires that you have this entire booklet (or that of another state; they are all nearly identical) memorized, cover to cover.
  - mlyle 4y ago
    I'm not sure why you sent this to me. That book was actually the source of: * The 3 second rule I cited: "To avoid tailgating, use the “3 second rule”: when the vehicle ahead of you passes a certain point, such as a sign, count “one-thousand-one, one-thousand- two, one-thousand-three.” This takes approximately 3 seconds. If you pass the same point before you finish counting, you are following too closely." https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/visual-search/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-han... * Real-world stopping distances being longer than 3 seconds (3 seconds * 55MPH = 242 feet) -- "Assuming you have good tires, brakes, and dry pavement: At 55 mph, it takes about 400 feet to react and bring your vehicle to a complete stop." Of course, all this is orthogonal to my main point: If someone dives and brakes in front of you, with a slower starting speed and equivalent or better brakes: you're a-gonna hit them. And no one seriously proposes that you should never drive faster than the lane next to you, which would be the only way to avoid this.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- omgwtfbyobbq 4y ago
  Following distances are just guidelines, assuming traffic is moving normally. The California Driver's Handbook says... > California’s “Basic Speed Law” means that you may never drive faster than is safe for current conditions. > You must drive slower when there is heavy traffic or bad weather. However, if you block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic by driving too slowly, you may be cited. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/laws-and-rules-of-the-road/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-han... The Tesla, FSD or not, blocked the flow of traffic and was partially at fault. The vehicles behind the Tesla were driving too fast given the conditions and were also partially at fault. The handbook is structured to minimize the chance/danger of accidents even if other drivers aren't adhering to it.
  - dark-star 4y ago
    I don't think that source is neither exhaustive nor authoritative. It doesn't tell you e.g. that you have to stop at red lights, which I'm pretty sure you're required to by law. I'm no expert in US law but I think there's probably at least a dozen separate laws on what is (il)legal, and I'd bet it's more than the 8 paragraphs in the source you linked to
  - mlyle 4y ago
    You can cause an accident any time you want by diving in front of faster traffic and braking. You will start from a slower speed and have equivalent deceleration.
    - omgwtfbyobbq 4y ago
      You'll only cause an accident if the faster traffic is driving too fast for the conditions and/or not maintaining sufficient distance from other vehicles, especially your vehicle. You could ram the other vehicle. In that case no amount of safe/defensive driving would stop that. But a safe/defensive driver will go as slow as you do if you merge in front of them.
      - mlyle 4y ago
- carlmr 4y ago
  >Recommended following distances are nowhere near "instant stop of vehicle in front of you plus reaction time". But the nothing can instantly stop, it's physics. The recommendations, at least in Germany are so that you have enough time to react + brake if the car in front of you does an emergency braking manœuvre. If the car merges into your lane at too little distance, like here, you have to slow down. A lot of people don't.
  - mlyle 4y ago
    > But the nothing can instantly stop, it's physics. A car striking a pileup in front of you can come pretty close, though.
- rags2riches 4y ago
  > The car departed the lane next to them, dove in front of them, and stopped That explains a two-car collision. The following pileup is explained by drivers not leaving enough space to react and brake.
  - mlyle 4y ago
    > The following pileup is explained by drivers not leaving enough space to react and brake. The rest of the pileup is varied. Some of it is from too short following distances or really lack of reaction. Some drivers in the back had no ability to see the pileup ahead and had cars stop in front of them (from dissipating their energy in a collision) in less distance than they could brake.
    - rags2riches 4y ago
      > Some drivers in the back had no ability to see the pileup ahead and had cars stop in front of them (from dissipating their energy in a collision) in less distance than they could brake. In other words, these drivers did not leave enough distance to react and brake.
      - mlyle 4y ago
        > In other words, these drivers did not leave enough distance to react and brake. Again, recommended following distance is ~250-300 feet when stopping & reaction time can be 350-400 feet. This is OK when the car in front of you brakes, because you'll both be decelerating with a similar profile and you'll have more than 250-300 feet to stop. It is not OK when the car in front of you stops substantially faster than braking with no warning because it has hit an unknown obstacle.
amatecha 4y ago
Yeah, watching the video, the vehicles behind had every opportunity to prevent the accident(s). They were all following too closely (in general) and didn't decelerate in proper response to the conditions. I've had vehicles literally pull out in front of me (like crossing the road I'm on perpendicularly) and I still braked to a correct extent to avoid t-boning the idiot who made a colossal mistake. As soon as they even edged forward, I was already feathering the brake anticipating the situation. I would have done the same if this Tesla changed into my lane with such poor distance. The person who hit the Tesla could absolutely without question have avoided hitting them. I can see that the driver applies their brakes but clearly not hard enough. I think they incorrectly expected the Tesla to resume speed. Emergencies happen, sometimes the person in front of you may completely slam their brakes on. In this case, the Tesla was WELL into the lane before they braked, so the driver behind already had every opportunity to ensure proper distance -- the Tesla had long since become "a vehicle in your lane in front of you". Further, so many of the drivers in this video have a serious lack of driving skill, as they simply maintain speed and try to swerve around, creating dangerous conditions for themselves and everyone around them.
monkeydreams 4y ago
> no opportunity means they were following too closely. No. This is the difference between following a car that slows suddenly and stops versus a stationary object suddenly appears on the road in front of you. > if the car in front of you suddenly comes to a complete stop, This is the point - the car in front of them moved and revealed an already stationary car. The SUV jerked out of the lane without warning or prolonged use of brake lights right behind the stopped Tesla. The following drivers suddenly have far less processing and reaction time and likely would not be aware for at least a second that the car now in front of them was actually stopped and not just slowing down.
- Schroedingersat 4y ago
  You should always leave at least two secondstothe car in front. The first car behind the SUV may have had no time to stop if the speed limit was over 80km/h, but everyone behind had no excuse.

mlyle 4y ago

> no opportunity means they were following too closely. The car departed the lane next to them, dove in front of them, and stopped. Do you always leave enough space so that a vehicle in the lane next to you can do this? > if you are so close that you can't stop in time in that situation, you are following too closely. end of statement. > yes that does happen to cars, by the way. a car driving at speed X which hits another car head-on at speed X will cause both cars to come to a complete stop, instantly, provided they are the same mass. usually they are not the same mass, so that car which you were following could suddenly not only stop, but change direction and accelerate towards you. Recommended following distances are nowhere near "instant stop of vehicle in front of you plus reaction time". E.g. California recommends 3 seconds of distance at your current speed-- 286 feet. Real world stopping distances are often ~300+ feet, after 100 feet+ of reaction time (yes, I know that vehicle tests in ideal conditions often achieve something more like 150 feet not including reaction times).

naikrovek 4y ago
please get a "rules of the road" booklet from your local driver's services facility and read it. assuming you are in California: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/laws-and-rules-of-the-road/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-han... operating a motor vehicle in the United States requires that you have this entire booklet (or that of another state; they are all nearly identical) memorized, cover to cover.
- mlyle 4y ago
  I'm not sure why you sent this to me. That book was actually the source of: * The 3 second rule I cited: "To avoid tailgating, use the “3 second rule”: when the vehicle ahead of you passes a certain point, such as a sign, count “one-thousand-one, one-thousand- two, one-thousand-three.” This takes approximately 3 seconds. If you pass the same point before you finish counting, you are following too closely." https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/visual-search/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-han... * Real-world stopping distances being longer than 3 seconds (3 seconds * 55MPH = 242 feet) -- "Assuming you have good tires, brakes, and dry pavement: At 55 mph, it takes about 400 feet to react and bring your vehicle to a complete stop." Of course, all this is orthogonal to my main point: If someone dives and brakes in front of you, with a slower starting speed and equivalent or better brakes: you're a-gonna hit them. And no one seriously proposes that you should never drive faster than the lane next to you, which would be the only way to avoid this.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
omgwtfbyobbq 4y ago
Following distances are just guidelines, assuming traffic is moving normally. The California Driver's Handbook says... > California’s “Basic Speed Law” means that you may never drive faster than is safe for current conditions. > You must drive slower when there is heavy traffic or bad weather. However, if you block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic by driving too slowly, you may be cited. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/laws-and-rules-of-the-road/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-han... The Tesla, FSD or not, blocked the flow of traffic and was partially at fault. The vehicles behind the Tesla were driving too fast given the conditions and were also partially at fault. The handbook is structured to minimize the chance/danger of accidents even if other drivers aren't adhering to it.
- dark-star 4y ago
  I don't think that source is neither exhaustive nor authoritative. It doesn't tell you e.g. that you have to stop at red lights, which I'm pretty sure you're required to by law. I'm no expert in US law but I think there's probably at least a dozen separate laws on what is (il)legal, and I'd bet it's more than the 8 paragraphs in the source you linked to
- mlyle 4y ago
  You can cause an accident any time you want by diving in front of faster traffic and braking. You will start from a slower speed and have equivalent deceleration.
  - omgwtfbyobbq 4y ago
    You'll only cause an accident if the faster traffic is driving too fast for the conditions and/or not maintaining sufficient distance from other vehicles, especially your vehicle. You could ram the other vehicle. In that case no amount of safe/defensive driving would stop that. But a safe/defensive driver will go as slow as you do if you merge in front of them.
    - mlyle 4y ago
carlmr 4y ago
>Recommended following distances are nowhere near "instant stop of vehicle in front of you plus reaction time". But the nothing can instantly stop, it's physics. The recommendations, at least in Germany are so that you have enough time to react + brake if the car in front of you does an emergency braking manœuvre. If the car merges into your lane at too little distance, like here, you have to slow down. A lot of people don't.
- mlyle 4y ago
  > But the nothing can instantly stop, it's physics. A car striking a pileup in front of you can come pretty close, though.
rags2riches 4y ago
> The car departed the lane next to them, dove in front of them, and stopped That explains a two-car collision. The following pileup is explained by drivers not leaving enough space to react and brake.
- mlyle 4y ago
  > The following pileup is explained by drivers not leaving enough space to react and brake. The rest of the pileup is varied. Some of it is from too short following distances or really lack of reaction. Some drivers in the back had no ability to see the pileup ahead and had cars stop in front of them (from dissipating their energy in a collision) in less distance than they could brake.
  - rags2riches 4y ago
    > Some drivers in the back had no ability to see the pileup ahead and had cars stop in front of them (from dissipating their energy in a collision) in less distance than they could brake. In other words, these drivers did not leave enough distance to react and brake.
    - mlyle 4y ago
      > In other words, these drivers did not leave enough distance to react and brake. Again, recommended following distance is ~250-300 feet when stopping & reaction time can be 350-400 feet. This is OK when the car in front of you brakes, because you'll both be decelerating with a similar profile and you'll have more than 250-300 feet to stop. It is not OK when the car in front of you stops substantially faster than braking with no warning because it has hit an unknown obstacle.

amatecha 4y ago

Yeah, watching the video, the vehicles behind had every opportunity to prevent the accident(s). They were all following too closely (in general) and didn't decelerate in proper response to the conditions. I've had vehicles literally pull out in front of me (like crossing the road I'm on perpendicularly) and I still braked to a correct extent to avoid t-boning the idiot who made a colossal mistake. As soon as they even edged forward, I was already feathering the brake anticipating the situation. I would have done the same if this Tesla changed into my lane with such poor distance. The person who hit the Tesla could absolutely without question have avoided hitting them. I can see that the driver applies their brakes but clearly not hard enough. I think they incorrectly expected the Tesla to resume speed. Emergencies happen, sometimes the person in front of you may completely slam their brakes on. In this case, the Tesla was WELL into the lane before they braked, so the driver behind already had every opportunity to ensure proper distance -- the Tesla had long since become "a vehicle in your lane in front of you". Further, so many of the drivers in this video have a serious lack of driving skill, as they simply maintain speed and try to swerve around, creating dangerous conditions for themselves and everyone around them.

monkeydreams 4y ago

> no opportunity means they were following too closely. No. This is the difference between following a car that slows suddenly and stops versus a stationary object suddenly appears on the road in front of you. > if the car in front of you suddenly comes to a complete stop, This is the point - the car in front of them moved and revealed an already stationary car. The SUV jerked out of the lane without warning or prolonged use of brake lights right behind the stopped Tesla. The following drivers suddenly have far less processing and reaction time and likely would not be aware for at least a second that the car now in front of them was actually stopped and not just slowing down.

Schroedingersat 4y ago
You should always leave at least two secondstothe car in front. The first car behind the SUV may have had no time to stop if the speed limit was over 80km/h, but everyone behind had no excuse.