3 ms·
Modern neural network architectures are Turing complete [1]. So I don't see any argument for a limit in principle unless you are arguing that a Turing machine c
by fasterik 4y ago
Modern neural network architectures are Turing complete [1]. So I don't see any argument for a limit in principle unless you are arguing that a Turing machine can't achieve language understanding. If that's what you're saying, then I wonder who is espousing mysticism here.
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03429 https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03429
- thomastjeffery 4y agoAre you forgetting the distinction between a program and a computer? Language understanding doesn't magically spawn itself as a process on your computer! Someone has to write that program first. And that's my point. ChatGPT transforms language, but it does not understand it. For that, we will need a different kind of program.
- fasterik 4y agoLanguage understanding doesn't magically spawn itself as a process on your computer! Someone has to write that program first. Do you think it's impossible for such a program to emerge as weights in a Turing complete neural network architecture?