8 ms·

The 200 one seemed underwhelming. Sounded more like someone posting online trying to sound really smart

by thinking4real 4y ago

w0de0 4y ago
I don't think it is thinking 4 real
samuria 4y ago
Well, that's exactly what it has been fed with, so it makes sense why it would be sounding that way.
paxys 4y ago
IMO it didn't sound like a person at all, just a passage lifted out of a science textbook.
azalemeth 4y ago
There is also a lot more that one could say about rain: dry adiabatic lapse rates, phase transitions, the role of dust and aerosols as a nucleation site, Clausius Cleyparon, and the ilk would be natural things for this persona to talk about. Instead it sounded like SEO spam on steroids.
mc32 4y ago
Unusual in that they all have the same spelling ability.
- m00x 4y ago
  Unless I'm mistaken, chatGPT is trained on word embeddings, so it can't really make spelling mistakes, unless those misspelled words are included in the vocabulary.
  - Kaibeezy 4y ago
    It can also be directed to include any degree of spelling and grammar errors, as camouflage. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34136940 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34136940
- CodeyWhizzBang 4y ago
  Although the grammar is quite poor in the 50 IQ one
geysersam 4y ago
It probably haven't had much practice. It's not like the internet is shock full of texts tagged with the IQ of the author. It is, however, full of SEO texts, Wikipedia articles, and /r/askscience answers.
- m00x 4y ago
  There are also 1 in 6B people with an IQ of 200 or above, and I imagine they're not prefacing every public forum interaction with: "I have an IQ of 200, here's my take on..."
- Kaibeezy 4y ago
  “chock” full (IQ 150)
  - geysersam 4y ago
    Thank you. I'm doing the best I can with my peak of the bell curve IQ.
    - Kaibeezy 4y ago
      fuhgeddaboudit
zardo 4y ago
I think it captures the style of a person who posts about their 200 IQ well.
mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
Maybe it means a "200" iq from someone who did an online quiz once.

The 200 one seemed underwhelming. Sounded more like someone posting online trying to sound really smart

w0de0 4y ago

I don't think it is thinking 4 real

samuria 4y ago

Well, that's exactly what it has been fed with, so it makes sense why it would be sounding that way.

paxys 4y ago

IMO it didn't sound like a person at all, just a passage lifted out of a science textbook.

azalemeth 4y ago

There is also a lot more that one could say about rain: dry adiabatic lapse rates, phase transitions, the role of dust and aerosols as a nucleation site, Clausius Cleyparon, and the ilk would be natural things for this persona to talk about. Instead it sounded like SEO spam on steroids.

mc32 4y ago

Unusual in that they all have the same spelling ability.

m00x 4y ago
Unless I'm mistaken, chatGPT is trained on word embeddings, so it can't really make spelling mistakes, unless those misspelled words are included in the vocabulary.
- Kaibeezy 4y ago
  It can also be directed to include any degree of spelling and grammar errors, as camouflage. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34136940 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34136940
CodeyWhizzBang 4y ago
Although the grammar is quite poor in the 50 IQ one

geysersam 4y ago

It probably haven't had much practice. It's not like the internet is shock full of texts tagged with the IQ of the author. It is, however, full of SEO texts, Wikipedia articles, and /r/askscience answers.

m00x 4y ago
There are also 1 in 6B people with an IQ of 200 or above, and I imagine they're not prefacing every public forum interaction with: "I have an IQ of 200, here's my take on..."
Kaibeezy 4y ago
“chock” full (IQ 150)
- geysersam 4y ago
  Thank you. I'm doing the best I can with my peak of the bell curve IQ.
  - Kaibeezy 4y ago
    fuhgeddaboudit

zardo 4y ago

I think it captures the style of a person who posts about their 200 IQ well.

mrcheesebreeze 4y ago

Maybe it means a "200" iq from someone who did an online quiz once.