3 ms·

This study is from one of the original links I shared... You accused me of gish gallopping. I've since slowed down and focused on specific events. See my other

by culi 4y ago

This study is from one of the original links I shared... You accused me of gish gallopping. I've since slowed down and focused on specific events. See my other comments about the battery swapping scam for example. Please provide some actual data proving these cars are safer than average. Tesla certainly hasn't been able to. And research, like the one I just linked which you refused to acknowledge, definitely does not back up Elon's claims

ajross 4y ago
> Please provide some actual data proving these cars are safer than average. Tesla certainly hasn't been able to. But... they have. That's exactly the link we're discussing. You don't want that to be true, so you're digging around trying to pretend via a flood of bad evidence that they're somehow "lying" in that data. But... what if they aren't? Again, three million cars are an awfully big signal to try to spin. Isn't the Occam's Razor interpretation (also jives with my personal experience with the product, FWIW) that... they're safe?
- culi 4y ago
  I can't tell if you forgot a </s> there but just in case you're sincere... I just paid $5k on a used extended van. One of the most dangerous cars you can buy. Obviously I don't expect this to be any safer than a $100k Tesla. Similarly, I find any comparison between the "average car" and a Tesla's crash ratings to be completely useless. How do we know that other luxury cars around that price point don't actually do much much better than tesla does? The "data" provided is insincere at best. It's also not actual data. They're just telling us some numbers. They've consistently refused to provide any actual data This OP also again makes the claim of the "lowest probability of injury of any car by NHTSA" which the NHTSA has repeatedly asked them to stop saying.[0] The NHTSA doesn't rank cars by probability of injury at all Remember when they said the Tesla S earned 5.4 stars and NHTSA had to make a public statement that it does not award more than 5 stars? lol. Yet another lie [0] https://krcrtv.com/features/auto-matters/nhtsa-to-tesla-stop-claiming-your-cars-are-the-safest https://krcrtv.com/features/auto-matters/nhtsa-to-tesla-stop...

by culi 4y ago

ajross 4y ago

> Please provide some actual data proving these cars are safer than average. Tesla certainly hasn't been able to. But... they have. That's exactly the link we're discussing. You don't want that to be true, so you're digging around trying to pretend via a flood of bad evidence that they're somehow "lying" in that data. But... what if they aren't? Again, three million cars are an awfully big signal to try to spin. Isn't the Occam's Razor interpretation (also jives with my personal experience with the product, FWIW) that... they're safe?

culi 4y ago
I can't tell if you forgot a </s> there but just in case you're sincere... I just paid $5k on a used extended van. One of the most dangerous cars you can buy. Obviously I don't expect this to be any safer than a $100k Tesla. Similarly, I find any comparison between the "average car" and a Tesla's crash ratings to be completely useless. How do we know that other luxury cars around that price point don't actually do much much better than tesla does? The "data" provided is insincere at best. It's also not actual data. They're just telling us some numbers. They've consistently refused to provide any actual data This OP also again makes the claim of the "lowest probability of injury of any car by NHTSA" which the NHTSA has repeatedly asked them to stop saying.[0] The NHTSA doesn't rank cars by probability of injury at all Remember when they said the Tesla S earned 5.4 stars and NHTSA had to make a public statement that it does not award more than 5 stars? lol. Yet another lie [0] https://krcrtv.com/features/auto-matters/nhtsa-to-tesla-stop-claiming-your-cars-are-the-safest https://krcrtv.com/features/auto-matters/nhtsa-to-tesla-stop...