3 ms·
A large part of the value is not the software, but the knowledge built around the software, and that knowledge must be known and understood by someone (the deve
by lo_zamoyski 4y ago
A large part of the value is not the software, but the knowledge built around the software, and that knowledge must be known and understood by someone (the developers). This includes everything from domain knowledge, the history of why things are the way they are, what failed and what succeeded, the technical idiosyncrasies, etc. The software is in a sense secondary, certainly secondary to business goals as its entire purpose is to serve business goals. Software is a means and an instrument, not an end.
But perverse incentives make churn attractive. Switching jobs is often the best way to raise your income, for example.
- ozim 4y agoNow we have to take this argument and explain it to people wanting to get rid of developers and use low code or chat gpt.
- datavirtue 4y agoI just tell them to go right ahead.
- weatherlite 4y agoWho will operate the low code and chat gpt though ? It's not clear to me at all that the humans can be totally skipped in the near future. Maybe reduce their headcount but even that one is debatable (if devs become more productive they will get more tasks, create more companies etc).