3 ms·
Linux phones don't need it. Linux itself needs it. Red Hat is the closest we've got, but while they've sponsored great work at unifying the lower-levels of Lin
by Nextgrid 4y ago
Linux phones don't need it. Linux itself needs it.
Red Hat is the closest we've got, but while they've sponsored great work at unifying the lower-levels of Linux via systemd, the desktop level is still severely lacking, not to mention the lack of a good, corporate-supported "reference" distro putting all those ideas in a coherent package. Sadly it doesn't seem to be a priority for them as they have the funding, manpower and influence to pull it off if they wanted to.
Once we get good and usable Linux on desktops for the masses, phones can catch up (and I'd argue they'd have an advantage here as they'd be able to reuse all that desktop-focused work and run Linux apps out-of-the-box).
What's holding Linux back is the lack of a coherent vision - everyone does their little thing in their own corner with their own vision and ideologies (which are sometimes contradictory), leading to a lot of wasted work and yields a subpar user experience since all those various components don't integrate 100%.
- linmob 4y agoIf only it made sense economically, I bet someone would do it. As desktop OSes are perceived to be free (comes at no extra cost with the hardware, including updates for multiple years), there's not nearly the same Return On Investment as in B2B cloud and server markets. RedHat realized this aeons ago, Canonical followed in 2017. At the same time, commercial products are being downgraded in usability by nagging users to subscribe to paid add-on services, telemetry and ads. And you can't even pay to 'get back to sanity'.
- db579 4y agoSurely that vision is exactly what (vanilla) Gnome is? On Desktop and on Mobile (with LibAdwaita). Incidentally they also seem to get a lot of criticism for having a strong vision.