3 ms·
This is a really solid point with which I agree! I think the only caveat is there is much debate about where to set the minimum wage, and it's not crystal clea
by runako 4y ago
This is a really solid point with which I agree!
I think the only caveat is there is much debate about where to set the minimum wage, and it's not crystal clear what is the appropriate number. So for that debate I do think it is reasonable to use as a proxy "is the employee paid enough to not qualify for means-tested social assistance programs," because there is obviously a relationship in practice between the minimum wage and the amount ultimately spent on social assistance. This is only really true because the means-tested programs phase out as income increases, which would not be true of single-payer healthcare (so the argument doesn't make sense in that case).
- legitster 4y agoI don't have a strong opinion on minimum wage, but it's pretty clear you can have equally good outcomes with multiple different approaches. There are some very progressive countries with no effective minimum wage (Finland being a notable example). So to provide an analysis that is mathematically only going to favor one approach seems a bit jaded to me.