> I don’t understand how podiatrists isn’t at 100%? Maybe residency accounts for some of it? Could also be a significant number of solo practices just getting

> I don’t understand how podiatrists isn’t at 100%? Maybe residency accounts for some of it? Could also be a significant number of solo practices just getting started? (Gross numbers might be unintuitive or misleading for doctors renting or buying office space and trying to advertise.) Could also be anomalies in the survey, noise in the data and/or how they categorize jobs, perhaps some number of reported podiatrists are podiatry assistants who are in school? Could be some podiatrists choose to serve low income and/or uninsured folks? Maybe a weighted combination of all the above and some other factors?