> If the city was populated by 60% people who do not earn enough to live Earning enough to live is a fuzzy idea. I'm not satisfied unless I'm maxing multiple r

> If the city was populated by 60% people who do not earn enough to live Earning enough to live is a fuzzy idea. I'm not satisfied unless I'm maxing multiple retirement accounts, have a year of saved income, insurance, etc. I think the figure is believable if you're fine with not saving, not having insurance, dodging taxes, etc. An alarming number of people are okay with this.