Unclear what the value is of this narrow semantic argument using tenuous analogies. Her point is that there are more reasonable alternatives to improving air q

Unclear what the value is of this narrow semantic argument using tenuous analogies. Her point is that there are more reasonable alternatives to improving air quality if people want to keep using gas. You seem to think that spending money on less desirable cooking options is the best way for people to use that money. As if the people proposing this heavy handed approach have considered the cost/benefit for the whole universe of cooks.