Sorry, but can anyone explain how having one or more AI lawyers is any different from allowing an AI judge in a proceeding? First of all, AIs are not beholden

Sorry, but can anyone explain how having one or more AI lawyers is any different from allowing an AI judge in a proceeding? First of all, AIs are not beholden to the bar association. They aren't at risk of losing their license to practice. A poor AI will not convince a human judge as well as a human lawyer, leaving the defendant with an improperly executed defense. A great AI might, perhaps, be able to win a case, but then the question would be whether the human judge was able to understand the full implications of the AI's arguments. Only an AI judge would be able to rule impartially against an AI lawyer. Which I'd assume we would all find to be a horrific path for our already completely fucked up justice system to follow. After all, if AI can be lawyer and judge, it would only make sense to have the laws written by AI legislators, approved by the AI executive branch, and enforced by the AI police and military.