3 ms·
pg deserves a lot of credit for predicting this a decade ago: http://paulgraham.com/ambitious.html http://paulgraham.com/ambitious.html > The way to win here i
by sillysaurusx 4y ago
pg deserves a lot of credit for predicting this a decade ago: http://paulgraham.com/ambitious.html http://paulgraham.com/ambitious.html
> The way to win here is to build the search engine all the hackers use. A search engine whose users consisted of the top 10,000 hackers and no one else would be in a very powerful position despite its small size, just as Google was when it was that search engine. And for the first time in over a decade the idea of switching seems thinkable to me.
> Since anyone capable of starting this company is one of those 10,000 hackers, the route is at least straightforward: make the search engine you yourself want. Feel free to make it excessively hackerish. Make it really good for code search, for example. Would you like search queries to be Turing complete? Anything that gets you those 10,000 users is ipso facto good.
Whether by accident or by design, OpenAI did exactly that. And it all came down to them doing a little contract work for GitHub, in which OpenAI were the recipient of terabytes of code.
What a turn. Imagine if Microsoft becomes the new Google.
- gkoberger 4y agoIf we're giving pg credit for calling things over decade ago, look at #5 on this list behind Steve Jobs, Larry and Sergey: http://www.paulgraham.com/5founders.html http://www.paulgraham.com/5founders.html
- potamic 4y agoIf anything, ChatGPT will be for the masses. Programming as a skill has been commoditized a fair bit over the last decade and I believe the kind of hackers pg was talking about would actively eschew all forms of AI search.