3 ms·
Perhaps they were referring to colour monitors of the same vintage. Cheap composite monitors were terrible. Component video was much better, but also more expen
by II2II 4y ago
Perhaps they were referring to colour monitors of the same vintage. Cheap composite monitors were terrible. Component video was much better, but also more expensive and not all systems supported it. I also seem to recall the text being fuzzier on component than on monochrome displays, but that may have been a function of the electronics or picture tubes of the monitors I had access to.
- anikom15 4y agoMonochrome monitors are absolutely more sharp. There is no shadow mask so the image is smoother.