3 ms·
> the appropriate response is different for "I saw this in my logs and it looks weird but it's not bothering me" versus "this is causing serious problems for my
by rakoo 4y ago
> the appropriate response is different for "I saw this in my logs and it looks weird but it's not bothering me" versus "this is causing serious problems for my site". We have been getting mixed signals about which it is
We have not been reading the same tickets and articles it seems
- jdiff 4y agoNo problems were ever mentioned, serious or otherwise. Elevated traffic isn't automatically a problem. Drew's played it up quite a lot elsewhere, but the Go team can only be reasonably expected to follow the one issue filed, not Drew's entire online presence.
- simon_o 4y agoYou mean the issue they banned him from? ;-)
- jdiff 4y agoYes. He had plenty of opportunity to state problems if they existed. Relaying harm caused would have likely accelerated things, and if harm was being done he would have taken up the still-open offer to solve this problem in the interim while the real solution is pushed out instead of writing misrepresentative and openly salty blog posts for years. Even with him being banned, the Go team is still tracking this issue, still brings it up internally, and has pushed a feature that would fix this ahead by an entire release. So yes. The issue they banned him from. Because reality's more complicated than flippant one liners.