> if you want to convince us the harm is too great, then quantify it for our judgement. That's literally what TFA does. Dispute the data or the argument if you

> if you want to convince us the harm is too great, then quantify it for our judgement. That's literally what TFA does. Dispute the data or the argument if you want. "This site looks like it doesn't like fossil fuels" is not disputing the data. It's "I suspect there's another side that's not represented [duh] and I therefore will dismiss this information out of hand." It's a terrible heuristic to get anywhere.