2 ms·
This example isn’t very compelling because we might as well say the cat died two days ago you just found out later.
by zeroonetwothree 4y ago
This example isn’t very compelling because we might as well say the cat died two days ago you just found out later.
- Nomentatus 4y agoExcept that that's precisely what some Copenhagen Interpretation guys actually wanted to say; that the collapse of superposition didn't happen two days ago. Hence S's large-living-object example. You want to be sensible, they (according S) didn't. Their "lack of sense" tends to force them to many-worlds views. But Einstein and S's being sensible pushed them towards thinking entanglement couldn't be a real thing. Although their best default position is to toss up their hands and say that there's gotta be a non-local hidden variable we just haven't found yet. But there are no candidates, as yet. (Unless you like Bohm, I suppose.)