> It did have some good tooling for creatives at least, but there are plenty of really good modern web tools with similar capabilities There really aren't. Bec

> It did have some good tooling for creatives at least, but there are plenty of really good modern web tools with similar capabilities There really aren't. Because the web can't even do animations properly. And Flash had a faster vector rendering model than SVG. > I'd argue because Flash was actually a pretty crude & raw interface builder that lacked much of the refinement, navigability, control, & capabilities we now take for granted. Ah yes, the refinement, navigability, control and capabilities of... what exactly do we take for granted? Where are these amazing tools that replaced flash and can be used for creatives, games, interactions...