> Why did Paizo use a license not designed by them? Lawyers cost money. > And if they did a full rewrite, are they under any obligation at all to Wizards of t

> Why did Paizo use a license not designed by them? Lawyers cost money. > And if they did a full rewrite, are they under any obligation at all to Wizards of the Coast? The theory is that they are not. > If they used the OGL to allow third-parties for Pathfinder, not D&D, what does this have to do with WotC? People point out that the PF2 works have OGL licenses. I'm sure we'll all find out in the coming weeks/months