3 ms·
This letter is proof they are not putting up with it. Or do you mean they should just stop playing DnD when WotC pulls this crap? > You only needed some friend
by remram 4y ago
This letter is proof they are not putting up with it. Or do you mean they should just stop playing DnD when WotC pulls this crap?
> You only needed some friends, dice and an imagination
Obviously you need rulebooks, campaign modules, etc. This is the stuff that is under license from WotC.
- the_af 4y agoSorry, my rant was semi-related: I mean the upcoming digital D&D app that Wizards of the Coast expects players to use. Isn't it crazy that they expect to sell you DLC for online avatars for a game that happens in your imagination? > Obviously you need rulebooks Yes. > campaign modules Unlike the rulebook, these are nice but not mandatory. And if you're crafty, you can derive inspiration from other fantasy worlds, books, novels and movies. I do understand not everybody is creative enough or wants to spend time doing this though; I also understand some people value a "shared world" they can discuss with other players beyond their group. > Or do you mean they should just stop playing DnD when WotC pulls this crap? At some point, yes. I mean, there are plenty of other awesome RPGs to play, right? You are not locked-in to D&D in the same sense many people are locked-in to Windows.
- SSLy 4y agoMore than D&D itself, and its players, the new "OGL" creates tremendous hurdles for the 3rd party, admittedly a little cottage, industry that bloomed around OGL. I'm absolutely fine without D&D, but Hasbro is going against makers of Pathfinder, my preferred dungeon crawler RPG.