4 ms·

Which part of the Constitution is violated by the government scanning a website's publicly-available, advertised resources on the clearnet?

• lesuorac 4y ago
  Unconstitutional just means it's not in the constitution. My claim is that nowhere in the constitution does it require the USG to audit a private company for security (especially in conjunction with an after major data breach clause).
  • thefurdrake 4y ago
    Yeah, I guess that ensuring foreign actors can't publicly dump massive amounts of data on an arbitrary number of american citizens to be used in economic warfare definitely doesn't fall under any mandates that the US government has...
    • lesuorac 4y ago
      Yeah, if it did you would've quoted it.
      • deleted 4y ago
        [deleted]
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]