4 ms·
And that makes the rest of the thread irrelevant? Here's Nord Stream AG directly saying they provided funding for WWF and BUND. https://www.nord-stream.com/pre
by mannerheim 4y ago
And that makes the rest of the thread irrelevant? Here's Nord Stream AG directly saying they provided funding for WWF and BUND.
https://www.nord-stream.com/press-info/press-releases/conservation-foundation-german-baltic-established-315/ https://www.nord-stream.com/press-info/press-releases/conser...
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> Nord Stream AG directly saying they provided funding for WWF and BUND That looks more like greenwashing than having a hand in promoting misinformation.
- mannerheim 4y agoBUND specifically states that they never opposed to construction of the Nord Stream pipeline, because they viewed natural gas as a good alternative to nuclear: https://twitter.com/simonwakter/status/1498228873682690050 https://twitter.com/simonwakter/status/1498228873682690050
- miguelazo 4y agoAnd? There's nothing here denouncing nuclear. Also, Nord Stream AG? You mean the Swiss holding company of which Gazprom is a partner? So the millions of dollars that Exxon, Chevron, etc. have spent on misinformation to undermine climate change concerns over the decades implicates the US government as well?
- mannerheim 4y agoWho owns Nord Stream AG?