3 ms·
Your argument seems to be based on the idea that Microsoft would do a better job than its competition technically. The fact that you're happy to rely on them al
by vladharbuz 4y ago
Your argument seems to be based on the idea that Microsoft would do a better job than its competition technically. The fact that you're happy to rely on them also seems to imply you think they're unlikely to act abusively. However, you're writing your comment in a thread about a similar megacorporation, Google, who is acting abusively, because their engineers are saying parsing a robots.txt file would be too difficult.
- adenozine 4y agoI actually wasn't making an argument but posing a question. Your reply seems defensive and emotional. I'm not sure what you mean by "act abusively" since the core of the product is storing and viewing source code. I mean, I could verify checksums if I needed to, and such a thing is common in workplaces I frequent. What I asked before, and I will reiterate for an additional attempt to your comprehension, is how can Sourcehut store and view source code BETTER than Github can?