4 ms·
I am genuinely intrigued as to why that's better? Especially as in the second part of your comment you restrict shareability/usability significantly from what
by ErrantX 4y ago
I am genuinely intrigued as to why that's better?
Especially as in the second part of your comment you restrict shareability/usability significantly from what the author wants to achieve (IE I can't as a free user bash out a diagram and share it, then later do another and share with a different person).
In fact the solution is so elegant when you think on it; free account volume is incredibly scalable, zero storage cost, offer immediate value but also a really simple upsell to pro accounts (save to the DB so you don't have to save the URls).
- devmunchies 4y ago> Especially as in the second part of your comment you restrict shareability/usability significantly no it doesn't. If my URL is `/thing#a1234` and I share it with you it will load my state for you. If you make a change, it's easy to push a new hash to the url that belongs to you. > I am genuinely intrigued as to why that's better? I didn't say it was better. We engineers are supposed to discuss solutions. I ended my last comment with "Just off the cuff thinking".
- kamikaz1k 4y agonot my fight, but you literally wrote: > Seems like it could be better Maybe you didn't mean it that way, but it does come across that way. Just a data point for you; I got no beef...
- devmunchies 4y agooh I guess I did. thanks. should have said "I wonder if its better".