The story is basically making medical claims without actual medical facts to back them up. Implying there's causation without actual medical studies seems very

The story is basically making medical claims without actual medical facts to back them up. Implying there's causation without actual medical studies seems very reckless and dangerous. As far as I know anyone can ask to have stuff taken down. I'm also not sure what the protocol should be? Should sensationalized medical information that isn't proven to be accurate be allowed spread around to anyone that's only qualification it the ability to click? On the other hand there are real whistle blowers and contrarian view points that need to be raised and or addressed for most issues.