3 ms·

The pedants among us might prefer: "novel among mainstream programming languages of the 21st century which predated Go".

• pjmlp 4y ago
  Pity that even Limbo from 20th century was more feature rich than Go.
  • throwaway894345 4y ago
    Pity that people still argue as though "feature rich" is some unmitigated good. :)
    • pjmlp 4y ago
      If it wasn't, Go wouldn't have gotten newer features.
      • throwaway894345 4y ago
        Obviously this isn't true, it only indicates that Go didn't pick exactly the right set of features at inception (and of course, no one claimed it did).
      • philosopher1234 4y ago
        Or the juice was worth the squeeze?