4 ms·
God, that’s so clowny. I have to assume that it was a decision made by “smart people who know better” (just like everything outside my professional domain that
by xxr 4y ago
God, that’s so clowny. I have to assume that it was a decision made by “smart people who know better” (just like everything outside my professional domain that perplexes me), but you could post this exact side-by-side to /r/movies with a title like, “So, I tried updating the color scheme—what do you think, Reddit?”
- dylan604 4y ago>but you could post this exact side-by-side to /r/movies with a title like, “So, I tried updating the color scheme—what do you think, Reddit?” but it's art, so of course you're going to get a plethora of opinions. some people just like warmer tones, some like cooler tones. even if you apply those tones in a way that makes the image less realistic and much more, ahem, artistic, people will naturally like/dislike depending on their perspective. the provided GBU examples and all others with side-by-side comparisons are stark, but if you only saw the "everything in mexico is orange" color scheme, it's not atrocious. i don't like it, but that's my opinion and doesn't mean it is wrong. when i grade images i shoot in RAW, i make decisions that others may or may not like. with the colors, i tend to keep them in the real world ranges if not with a bit of punch to the saturation. other people immediately hit the filters or swing the tint to get an otherworldly feel. at the end of the day, if the new color scheme is attractive to a younger audience and it gets younger people to watch an older movie, then is that so bad? it's not like Ted Turner got out his crayons to colorize a B&W movie.