4 ms·
It's a fabulous film, and when you compare it to the average Marvel blockbuster of today (which seems a relevant comparison), it just feels so much more full of
by mellosouls 4y ago
It's a fabulous film, and when you compare it to the average Marvel blockbuster of today (which seems a relevant comparison), it just feels so much more full of invention and magic.
- slater- 4y ago[flagged]
- cmsj 4y agoI mean.. Captain America: The First Avenger?
- slater- 4y agoI was trying to be funny
- hef19898 4y agoDoesn't Indy say exavtly that in one of the original three films?
- tablespoon 4y ago> Disney knows they'll lose money if any of their protagonists admits they hate Nazis. Um, no?
- donohoe 4y agoI always felt uncomfortable with Indy's relationship with Marion Ravenwood. According to the dialogue he was 25 and she was 14 or 15 when they had their relationship. That just strikes me as wrong and creepy and unsure how Spielberg/Lucas thought that was appropriate.
- DaveExeter 4y agoIt was a different era. A more civilized era.
- pantalaimon 4y ago16 according to https://indianajones.fandom.com/wiki/Marion_Ravenwood https://indianajones.fandom.com/wiki/Marion_Ravenwood
- donohoe 4y agoLooks like 15 is the intended age https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34318095 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34318095
- nautilius 4y agoI’m in the same camp. I love that movie but can’t bring myself to show it to my kids yet with that relationship, the rapey behavior of Jones forcing to get his kisses, and the casual killing.
- mellosouls 4y agoWow, I had no idea about that, though Wikipedia seems to say that was Karen Allen's own idea for a backstory. I don't remember it from the film though apparently it is in the novelisation which I've never read.
- donohoe 4y agoNo, did not appear to be her idea https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34318095 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34318095
- tablespoon 4y ago> According to the dialogue he was 25 and she was 14 or 15 when they had their relationship. Exactly what dialog? Because (based on my recollection) if there was any dialog that implied that, it was ambiguous or must be the kind of thing you'd have to be paying pretty careful attention to to pick up on. So close attention that you're probably ignoring the actual plot of the movie.
- fknorangesite 4y ago> Exactly what dialog? M: I learned to hate you in the last ten years. I: I never meant to hurt you. M: I was a child! I was in love! It was wrong and you knew it! I: You knew what you were doing. M: Now I do! This is my place. Get out! I: I did what I did. You don't have to be happy about it, but maybe we could help each other out now. https://youtu.be/Q4PlXSw0BQo?t=118 https://youtu.be/Q4PlXSw0BQo?t=118 It's ambiguous (since we don't know for sure how old Marion is during the events of Raiders), but "Marion was 16(ish)" is a perfectly valid reading.
- tablespoon 4y ago> It's ambiguous (since we don't know for sure how old Marion is during the events of Raiders), but "Marion was 16(ish)" is a perfectly valid reading Yeah, which is kind of my point. That may be a valid reading of the dialog, but so is 18, 20, or even 25. 16 may be in the movie's "writer's bible," but (IMHO) the viewer has to do too much work during that 10 seconds or so to get there. A regular viewer isn't paying much if any attention to the character's ages, and pretty much all of them will assume something legit.
- rickoooooo 4y agoYou can find a transcript from George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, and Larry Kasdan's original brainstorming sessions for this film online (http://maddogmovies.com/almost/scripts/raidersstoryconference1978.pdf http://maddogmovies.com/almost/scripts/raidersstoryconferenc...). In the transcript it's made clear that she would have been underage, but in the film it's only hinted at. Here's an excerpt: G — I was thinking that this old guy could have been his mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven. L — And he was forty-two. G — He hasn't seen her in twelve years. Now she's twenty-two. It's a real strange relationship. S — She had better be older than twenty-two. G — He's thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve. G — It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time. S — And promiscuous. She came onto him. G — Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it's an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she's sixteen or seventeen it's not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met. And she was madly in love with him and he...
- Fricken 4y agoI wonder I've never heard anyone say anything about "Big", directed by Penny Marshall and released in 1987. The main narrative thread in that film is unambiguously about a corporate executive who grooms and repeatedly rapes a pre-adolescent boy. It was hit with audiences and critics alike.
- donohoe 4y agoYou're not wrong.
- adql 4y agoI think it's the whole push to "decamp" the comic books when getting them to the big screen. It just makes them so much less interesting than source material.
- maxerickson 4y agoMy theory is that Iron Man demonstrated that super hero movies are a lot more profitable than comic book movies.
- CyberDildonics 4y agoWhat does that mean? Iron Man is a super hero from a comic book.
- tablespoon 4y ago>>> I think it's the whole push to "decamp" the comic books when getting them to the big screen. It just makes them so much less interesting than source material. >> My theory is that Iron Man demonstrated that super hero movies are a lot more profitable than comic book movies. > What does that mean? Iron Man is a super hero from a comic book. I'm not the OP, but I think he meant that "superhero characters" and "campy elements" are distinct characteristics, and the Iron Man movie demonstrated that dropping the latter make a film more appealing to a wider audience.