3 ms·
That's interesting. According to TFA, the i5-13600K has the best "performance / cost" ratio. So, all other things equal, for a "regular PC", the intel part loo
by vladvasiliu 4y ago
That's interesting.
According to TFA, the i5-13600K has the best "performance / cost" ratio. So, all other things equal, for a "regular PC", the intel part looks the most interesting, since it won't be any slower when you need it to actually do something for a few minutes (like compile something).
- neogodless 4y agoThough - now I see on the first of the links I posted, they show much higher idle power draw for the Intel parts, around 22-24W. I wonder why they have different numbers for the same parts on different articles.
- vladvasiliu 4y agoGood catch. Loaded figures for both and idle for AMD seem the same between the two articles...
- undersuit 4y agoIt could be the different motherboards. Phoronix used an ASUS for their Intel tests while TweakTown had a Gigabyte. Lots of tweaks on motherboards, i.e. give the CPU a bit more voltage than standard and it will boost more and your motherboard gives users more perfomance. Also just differences in measuring, was it from the wall or via voltage pads on the motherboard.