The main driver is technological advancement and the generated value is _obviously_ net positive. Not saying that there aren't issues that need to be discussed

The main driver is technological advancement and the generated value is _obviously_ net positive. Not saying that there aren't issues that need to be discussed, nor am I saying that there isn't any (unnecessary) hype. But the comparison to Web3 is a stretch. The author addresses this: > One last thought -- don't overindex on the web3 <> LLMs comparison. Of course web3 was pure hot air while LLMs is real tech with actual applications -- that's not the parallel I'm making. The parallel is in the bubble formation social dynamics, especially in the VC crowd. So aren't they just saying "hype is hype"? (edited an incomplete sentence)