So, first you say: > There isn't any reality behind that statement, it's somebody with an axe to grind And then you hilariously say: > discovered a right to

So, first you say: > There isn't any reality behind that statement, it's somebody with an axe to grind And then you hilariously say: > discovered a right to privacy in the bill of rights to get the outcome the justices wanted There is absolutely no reality behind that statement, you're just someone with an axe to grind. Bro. Did you even read Griswold (which is a completely different case than Roe)? Also, are you just gonna throw all penumbras out? This shit's been around since the 19th century. If not guaranteed by the 1st, 4th, and 9th the 14th adds it. Oh look, here's the right to privacy again: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/privacy/Privacy_brand_warr2.html https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priv... It's from 1890 in the notoriously disreputable HARVARD LAW REVIEW.