3 ms·
But... That's good no? > No video, audio, or text can be presumed real unless signed by the human subject. Where is the controversy in that?
by zigman1 4y ago
But... That's good no?
> No video, audio, or text can be presumed real unless signed by the human subject.
Where is the controversy in that?
- rippercushions 4y agoIt would be nice if we were at 100% signing, but currently we're at ~0%, and the transition is going to be rough.
- willnonya 4y agoWhy would that be nice? Follow the thou g ht through to how it would work and what it would mean in terms of privacy for the average person. Your niceties seem dystopian to me.
- jddj 4y agoAgreed. The time between now and then is much scarier. Companies can't even wrap their heads around sim swapping scams and social engineering of secret questions.
- Someone 4y agoThose subjects could lie. Journalists would have a hard time showing that an interviewee actually said what claim they said. Wire-tapping by the police also would become useless in court. ⇒ I would adjust it to “unless it has a reliably chain of trust”. That would mean that people could judge differently about whether to accept some things as true, but I think that’s unavoidable.