3 ms·
Hard disagree, I think 2 is actually a genius move after major fail with dall-e 2 pricing model. In general, they are probably looking for stable diffusion like
by actualwitch 4y ago
Hard disagree, I think 2 is actually a genius move after major fail with dall-e 2 pricing model. In general, they are probably looking for stable diffusion like adoption curve, but unless they have an offering people can use for free that is flexible enough (giving users just a prompt box is not flexible enough), someone else is going to eat their lunch on LLM's too, when you won't need colab to run them.
- zone411 4y agoI don't understand: many more people would use it for free in Bing/Word/Cortana than on a website that nobody used previously.
- actualwitch 4y agoTrue, they would. But there is a limit to how much you can get out of it with just a text box. Just look at dalle2 vs sd - even though dall-e is much more capable and clearly better one out of the two, sd gives much more consistent results if you know what you are doing. Because you have full access to model we now have novel ways of inlining some state to pieces of text to assign importance, whole algebra done on embeddings etc. When similar thing happens to llm's nobody will care about the text box in ms products.