>It's been at least 70 years since AI is supposed to replace everything a human can do I am sure someone made a statement like that 70 years ago. The fact that

>It's been at least 70 years since AI is supposed to replace everything a human can do I am sure someone made a statement like that 70 years ago. The fact that that person was wrong doesn't mean that nothing has happened. You claim that it's "mostly shit as basically everything", even though the featured article shows that it's close to passing the bar exam.