3 ms·
Actually, so far I've seen humanities people discard chatGPT output faster than sciences. In the humanties there is lots of well-written text of no useful dept
by CJefferson 4y ago
Actually, so far I've seen humanities people discard chatGPT output faster than sciences.
In the humanties there is lots of well-written text of no useful depth, so academics in the humanities get good at filtering it quickly. In the sciences, it seems "this is well written and well structured" is treated as a filter to assume the text probably contains something worth reading -- of course eventually it is found to be nonsense.
- threadweaver34 4y ago> In the humanties there is lots of well-written text of no useful depth This is already par for the course https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writing-college-student-essays/672371/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatg... > ...a professor in the U.K., used GPT-3, a large language model from OpenAI that automatically generates text from a prompt, to write it. (The whole essay, which Sharples considered graduate-level, is available, complete with references, here.) Personally, I lean toward a B+. The passage reads like filler, but so do most student essays.