Ok i could be wrong. Was commenting after reading arbitration documents where respondent is referred as "The Respondent is Kevin Watson" https://www.wipo.int/a

Ok i could be wrong. Was commenting after reading arbitration documents where respondent is referred as "The Respondent is Kevin Watson" https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0655.html https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d200... "The Respondent registered the domain name <gail.com> on April 4, 1996, named after his wife’s given name, as a birthday present for his wife. " So yes, looks like was wrong. It's his wife's site (A gift)