3 ms·
Note: this is not a continuation of the work by the same author. This is a new author who took the original and did further research. I think it's a bit disinge
by CGamesPlay 4y ago
Note: this is not a continuation of the work by the same author. This is a new author who took the original and did further research. I think it's a bit disingenuous to call this by the same name, "part 2".
- vore 4y agoIf Brandon Sanderson is allowed to finish The Wheel of Time, this author is allowed to call it part 2 ;-)
- CGamesPlay 4y agoYeah, but that was 2 years after the original author died. This is a month after the original publication. I just feel it would have been more tasteful to choose a title different than the one that the original author is obviously going to use for their next blog post.
- jeroenhd 4y agoI think it's actually more truthful to admit that this is the continuation of an earlier post than it is to say that this is new work. This is just the continuation of the process the first post documented. The relation between this article and the one it's based upon is clearly indicated in the first paragraph. I don't think this is disingenuous at all.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]