3 ms·

I don’t understand your comment. It doesn’t matter than Dansey’s name isn’t on the license. Writing document exists from the time when he was representing WotC

I don’t understand your comment. It doesn’t matter than Dansey’s name isn’t on the license. Writing document exists from the time when he was representing WotC where he says that the licence is intended as perpetual which is the point of him commenting on the whole thing. It’s not about 2022 Dancey. I understand you don’t like the guy but that doesn’t preclude him for saying relevant things.

hutzlibu 4y ago
"where he says that the licence is intended as perpetual" This is still not relevant here, it is about irrevocible. But apparently he also said that and it was in the official FAQ. If official FAQs are meaningless, then this just gives room for open fraud.