4 ms·
There were questions in the US with temperable voting machines in previous election cycles, Bush’s win against Kerry was especially suspicious with documented h
by kmos17 4y ago
There were questions in the US with temperable voting machines in previous election cycles, Bush’s win against Kerry was especially suspicious with documented hackable systems, and one key voting machine manufacturer ceo even quoted as saying he wanted to deliver votes for Bush.
But people have to decide if they want to live in a democracy or not. If you want a democratic system then you can question things and push for investigations, but you cannot storm government building because your side lost the election, that is the end of democracy. And at one point you have to decide to move on and try to win the next election cycle.
- matheusmoreira 4y agoIt's generous of you to assume we're living in a democracy right now. We're actually under a judiciary dictatorship. As far as I'm concerned, democracy ended in Brazil when openly and proudly biased judges started disproportionally censoring Bolsonaro and his supporters before, during and after the election over "fake news". This continues to this day, it's happening right now. Surely a person from a nation founded on the principles of freedom of speech would understand how tyrannical you have to be to assume the role of ministry of truth so you can silence others based on what you believe is false. I witnessed them ban a documentary before it was even released without even watching it. Do you call this a democracy? I don't blame them for attacking Brasília. They are tired of this corruption and literally don't know what else to do. I watched them get on their knees and beg the armed forces to do something, anything for over two months straight. If they must live under a dictatorship, they want a military one which they could at least respect, not this corrupt communist faux-democracy.