I'll be back in 5-10 years when the devs get over themselves and the application actually reflects the "simplicity, elegance, and usability" that it purports to

I'll be back in 5-10 years when the devs get over themselves and the application actually reflects the "simplicity, elegance, and usability" that it purports to. This may come off as unfair, but I say it as an artist who vividly recalls the frustration of using Blender and GIMP in the 2000s - and, particularly, of trying to get contributors to understand that, actually, the industry standard software had it right, you don't have to change basic UX elements, you're making it more difficult for us to use this software (or, perhaps even more important, to convince colleagues/bosses/collaborators to use it). I already see it in the comments here: users expressing their misgivings and others (admittedly, just one or two vocal individuals, for now) shouting down their concerns as stupid or irrational. My first impression was that this is unnecessary, though I'm coming around to the potential. If Gimel is destined to become a useful tool, I hope it's able to do so without the pain so many other pieces of software that are aimed at artists and designers that the devs won't listen to go through.