5 ms·
I'm at a loss as to how you can read that link and think it applies to filming people on the street. It states extremely clearly that you are only owed damaged
by Invictus0 4y ago
I'm at a loss as to how you can read that link and think it applies to filming people on the street. It states extremely clearly that you are only owed damaged if your likeness is used for the purpose of advertising or selling products.
- bagels 4y ago"Any person who knowingly uses another’s.., photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods or services, without such person’s prior consent" I guess it hinges on what is a product, or whether these videos are for the purpose of advertising or selling.
- xpe 4y agoSounds complicated. TikTok gets the advertising revenue? (I'm not familiar with how any potential profit sharing works.) Their lawyers / state sponsors probably have the bases covered.
- Animats 4y agoIt's complicated. See [1] Whether a monetized video is "advertising" is a nice legal question. [1] https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/california-right-publicity-law https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/california-right-publicity-...