3 ms·
It wouldn't surprised me if they leaked it themselves to either see what the outcry would be, or so they can release a version that's not as bad as the leak and
by darreninthenet 4y ago
It wouldn't surprised me if they leaked it themselves to either see what the outcry would be, or so they can release a version that's not as bad as the leak and people are happier with it even though it's still terrible.
- dndthrowwww 4y agoFar more likely this was an internal draft that an employee was horrified by.
- rhdunn 4y agoMy understanding (from sources such as Roll For Combat and Indestructoboy) is that: 1. various creators were sent OGL 1.1 licenses, a contract to sign, FAQ, and an NDA on/around Dec 21 to be signed by Jan 4th. 2. Rumours were circulating about the OGL license changes. 3. Once the NDA lifted on Jan 4th, the various people sent the licenses from (1) sent the OGL 1.1 license to others, including gizmodo.
- JTbane 4y agovarious creators were sent OGL 1.1 licenses, a contract to sign, FAQ, and an NDA on/around Dec 21 to be signed by Jan 4th. This is pretty underhanded and will cost WotC a lot of goodwill.