4 ms·
> Those people are just being themselves. That’s technically true but in practice useless. Nobody knows how to do almost anything ‘naturally’ in the sense you’
by simonh 4y ago
> Those people are just being themselves.
That’s technically true but in practice useless. Nobody knows how to do almost anything ‘naturally’ in the sense you’re using the word because we have learned to do practically everything. Yes I know there’s nature versus nurture, and innate nature is a thing, but in practice our social interactions are very largely learned.
Do you think it’s possible for people to learn and change? What you are arguing is that what that person learned up until then is the real ‘natural’ them and anything they learn after is somehow unnatural. Do I even need to take that line of reasoning any further?
- 4ad 4y ago> Do you think it’s possible for people to learn and change? Yes, if they get actionable advice, which they can understand and follow, which "just be yourself" is not an example of. It's not just useless advice, it's wrong, showing a fundamental misunderstanding by the advisor of what the problem with the advised person is. It's not only frustrating, but it causes the advised person to dismiss any further advice from the advisor.
- simonh 4y agoI think by itself you're right, it's ambiguous and dismissive. I think the basic idea behind it, trying to be more relaxed and comfortable in that situation to express more of your genuine personality than a special behaviour you adopt for dating situations, is on the right track though.