3 ms·
> Daniel Pink famously surmised2 that “carrots and sticks” are poor motivators for most people. Worse, they’re demonstrably counter-productive in common real-wo
by pronlover723 4y ago
> Daniel Pink famously surmised2 that “carrots and sticks” are poor motivators for most people. Worse, they’re demonstrably counter-productive in common real-world scenarios.
Which is why I think peer bonuses are a net negative. As the literature says, extrinsic rewards ruin things
- metacritic12 4y agoBest to just pay employees low and hope you can convince them about a mission and purpose (/s?)
- nine_k 4y agoPeer bonuses are not about receiving them! They are about the ability to give them, and seriously show appreciation that way. This is empowering and enjoyable.
- badtuple 4y agoSurely this changes depending on the individual giving/receiving? Regardless of intent you have people who would prize both. I've never worked in a place that had them, but I do know an individual who views it as a source of pride to collect as much as possible from peer bonuses. According to him it's not about the money, it just helps ease impostor syndrome since it's quantifiable and therefore suddenly the only "real" feedback he gets. Since it's quantifiable it renders any soft feedback he gets from his manager worthless in comparison. Not saying that's common, just saying that's just one of what must be many many interpretations of the incentive structure.