4 ms·
I'm the total opposite of a server guy, but I think your tests may be in some way flawed. At work we have a site that got high traffic for a few months on a ded
by pixeloution 15y ago
I'm the total opposite of a server guy, but I think your tests may be in some way flawed. At work we have a site that got high traffic for a few months on a dedicated box @ softlayer -- and it keeled over, unable to handle the outgoing data.
Moving the site to a EC2 large completely removed the problem.
I realize this is completely anecdotal without much detail (well I know the softlayer box runs about $200 a month, so it can't be their worst thing) but it does make me wonder.
- cmer 15y agoThat's very odd. James Golick of Fetlife had the opposite experience with Softlayer (link to his video in my post). I currently manage ~40 servers on EC2 and I'm confident that I could get away with just 5 "decent" dedicated boxes. EC2 gets expensive quickly, but most and foremost, managing so many instances is quite a headache.