> Something worth at least $8.5M is a minor trivial "misstep"? For a company with probably ten million affected customers within the relevant jurisdiction, yes

> Something worth at least $8.5M is a minor trivial "misstep"? For a company with probably ten million affected customers within the relevant jurisdiction, yes. The fine itself categorises this matter as a trivial misstep. Also your logic is weird. You’re using the assessed punishment as justification for why the assessed punishment is insufficient.