3 ms·
> As these images are created by an AI, no one has a claim to their copyright. Debatable. There have been instances where artist signatures have appeared in th
by paulryanrogers 4y ago
> As these images are created by an AI, no one has a claim to their copyright.
Debatable. There have been instances where artist signatures have appeared in the AI output. And if there is a profit motive then case for fair use is weaker.
- Popeyes 4y agoWasn't there a ruling where an AI art couldn't be copyrighted because it had no creator. So sucks if you make a game and then all your art assets get ripped for some other game.
- paulryanrogers 4y agoThe law is in flux. So until the legislature weighs in or a case reaches the higher courts that is a very real risk. Imagine a hugely popular game found to have clearly unlicensed copyrighted works, even in only fragments. It could become expensive legally and in reputation. (Especially for big publishers and devs who may be seen to profit from unlicensed copies of work from starving artists.)
- GaggiX 4y agoSignatures generated from scratch like the rest of the image, I think is an important aspect to specify.